On February 25, 2021, plaintiffs in the TikTok multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) submitted a motion to Judge John Z. Lee of the Northern District of Illinois, requesting preliminary approval of a $92 million settlement in the TikTok litigations. The settlement, if approved, will bring an end to an MDL comprised of 21 putative class actions that similarly allege that defendants TikTok Inc. (“TikTok”) and its parent company Byte Dance Technology Inc., mishandled issues of plaintiffs’ privacy.
Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that the popular video sharing app infiltrates its users’ devices and extracts a broad array of private data, including biometric data and content, which defendants then use to track and profile TikTok users for targeted advertising purposes which resulted in profit. Plaintiffs in the MDL argued that the defendants violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), California Comprehensive Data Access and Fraud Act (“CDAFA”), California Constitutional Right to Privacy, California Unfair Competition and False Advertising laws, California Constitutional Right to Privacy, California Unfair Competition and False Advertising laws, Video Privacy Protection Act (“VPPA”), Intrusion Upon Seclusion and restitution/unjust enrichment in addition to violation of Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (“BIPA”).
The $92 million settlement will be divided among both the nationwide class of plaintiffs and an Illinois sub-class on a pro rata basis. The motion described how class counsel intends to make an application to the court for attorneys’ fee awards in an amount not to exceed 33.33% of the settlement fund. Class representatives will receive up to $2,500.
It is estimated that the nationwide class is made up of 87.6 million TikTok users with the Illinois subclass estimated to be around 1.4 million users.
The case is: In re: TikTok Inc. Consumer Privacy Litigation, Case No.: 1:20-cv-04699, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Counsel Financial provides working capital credit lines exclusively for the plaintiffs' bar in all states except California, where credit lines are issued by California Attorney Lending.